“Oh. Oh holy hell. I just imagined how would it look like if you decided to start a comic/webcomic: “DON’T BUY OR READ THE COMIC BY KMCLAUDE!!! HE IS PROBLEMATIQUE AND DID SOME SHIT IN THE PAST [links with all your smut comics and descriptions] LIKE I SAID PROBLEMATIQUE.”

kmclaude:

“I also get UHM DONT SUPPORT KMCLAUDE HE IS A BASTARD MAN HE IS *list of literally libelous accusations with zero truth, also many conflicting ones but I’m sure someone in the industry has blacklisted me off of lies which is a bummer because god hate me for my crass teenage boy humor at least that’s quasi-valid* AND DESERVES TO DIE so like…not new at all”

  • None of the accusations against K. M. Claude are false or contradict each other.
  • Claude deserves to be blacklisted, considering what he’s guilty of.
  • Nothing Claude has posted can be excused as ‘crass teenage boy humor’.
    • He’s a grown man in his 20′s.
    • There’s no evidence that any of things Claude is accused of (admitting to being a pedophile, drawing pornographic artwork of children) are intended to be jokes.
    • Besides, even if he was joking, those jokes are in poor taste.
Advertisements

Screw Your Imaginary Psychological Damage

kmclaude:

“The irony being man you know antis spent so long trying to get me and others to stop making art and sure I now have severe psychological damage due to slander and harassment that can never be taken back or undone but man all they had to do was hook me and sugarbitz up from the get go rather than waiting for our friend to do so because now I’m too mentally distracted to draw.“

‘I have severe psychological damage due to slander and harassment’?! Honestly, I don’t know how K. M. Claude can accuse his critics of being professional victims when he posts things like this. Criticism isn’t a form of harassment, and Claude isn’t being slandered because the claims about him are backed up by evidence.

Besides, even if he did have psychological trauma as a result of being outed as a pedophile, it’s not reasonable to expect others to keep quiet about something that serious.

Calling People Monsters

kmclaude:

“If you call someone a monster enough, sooner or later they’ll begin to believe it despite being the farthest thing from it. If you’re not careful, some of the “monsters” you so carelessly made may begin to act monstrously and the fault will lie partly with you. And the rest of us you carelessly made believe in our nonexistent monstrosity? The many of us? Will just suffer in silence because beliefs are damn hard to change.“

#1. If you act like a monster because people are calling you one, you’ve only proven them right.

#2. People aren’t accusing K. M. Claude of being a terrible person for no reason. He’s openly admitted to being a pedophile, drawn sexual artwork of children, and harassed (Page contains depictions of blood and self-harm) people who disagree with him.

“You: *draws porn of little boys* LOL it’s just fiction chill. Also you: I want a harem of little boys.”

kmclaude:

You: *deliberately takes a joke out of context because that’s all you’ve got for your baseless accusations and hate*
I could draw a dog fucking the putrefying corpse of an infant on an altar with the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ in the middle of a satanic, cannibalistic orgy and it would still be just fiction – just art – rather than some reflection of my moral character. Amazing.

Anon’s got a point. You can’t claim your interests are solely confined to fiction when you openly long for your own underage harem and imply you’re an ephebophile. That dog/dead baby scenario you just came up with isn’t helping your case either.

Interesting how Claude demeans minors for being concerned about fiction that glamorizes child abuse and rape when he posts stuff like this.

“Since we all know your callout blog stalks your online presence for #receipts, I want to say I find it intellectually dishonest of them to ignore the (many) threats/baiting asks you get as if they are in no way responsible for it, and engage in victim-blaming, martyr-calling behaviour when you point out how aforementioned threats are detrimental to your well-being.”

kmclaude:

“You find it dishonest because it is in fact dishonest. “Truth? What is truth? I wash my hands of this matter” and all that.”

#1. Claude rarely gets any threats. Besides, he’s an open pedophile, so obviously people are going to send him hate.

#2. People sending asks expressing disgust/disagreement/etc. over Claude’s content isn’t baiting.

#3. I’ve never victim-blamed Claude, because he’s not a victim of anything except his own foolishness.

#4. This ask also ignores the many times Claude has overreacted to genuine criticism, citing it as an example of harassment. It also ignores the times Claude has harassed people and not apologized for it (Warning: Links contain gore and self harm-baiting).

Pay for your own therapy, dammit.

kmclaude:

#id like every anti to pay for the therapy i need#id like my hateblog to personally pay for my therapy for at minimum a year of weekly visits ti a therapist#bc i need it and not just for being trans

Screenshot of Mr. Krabs

[“Let me play a sad song for you on the world’s smallest violin!”]

Hot tip: other people aren’t responsible for the consequences of your bad behavior. If you get called out for being a pedophile and you feel bad about it, that’s entirely on you.

Worse Than Dahmer

kmclaude:

“WELL NOW HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO MARKET MY DIARY COMIC COLLECTION ‘WORSE THAN DAHMER’ IF I’M NO LONGER WORSE THAN A LITERAL NECROPHILIAC MINOR-FUCKING SERIAL KILLER BECAUSE I DRAW EROTIC GROTESQUE ART (ACCORDING TO SOME DUMB CUNT ON THIS SITE, A SITE WHICH IS A LOT SOMETIMES)? Man, there goes MY marketing technique.”

My exact words:

“I wouldn’t say K. M. Claude is as bad as Dahmer since Claude hasn’t killed or raped anyone.” – [x]

I never said you were as bad as Dahmer, quit lying.

Claude’s Drinking Problems

kmclaude:

“I probably am one – I go on mild benders, then stop for mooooonths, and then whoops. Which… probably fits the definition of ‘functional alcoholic’.

But I can’t use art as an outlet without being called every horrible thing in the book, harassed, abused, and treated like crap by everyone (including people I like) while the entire world around us goes to hell, so I might as well slowly kill myself and numb everything in the process. I’m just hoping I can make good enough art before that happens.”

Dude, you’ve reblogged posts blaming minors for their sexual trauma, you’ve openly longed for your own harem of little boys, and you’ve repeatedly treated your critics like crap. I don’t want to hear about how people who call you out are bullies and abusers. Also, quit blaming your critics for your drinking problems, it’s manipulative as hell.

I’m Not a Stalker

kmclaude:

“But Carrot you don’t understand: someone I don’t like is making art that I don’t agree with so I’m totally justified in my horrible, stalkerish, abusive, bored behavior duuuuUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH.”

Interesting how Claude accuses me of misusing words like ‘pedophile’ and ‘pedophilia’, yet here they are comparing legitimate criticism to stalking and abuse.