“The mods of that post are 16, 15, and 13? Go do your homework?”

kmclaude:

“why is a thirteen year old discoursing about sexual ships they should be on neopets not on a website whose mobile app is 17+ and which allows smut (18+ in I think Germany if I remember the screengrab @kirtlandswarbler took) if they don’t like fandom ships that for the record are older than they are for a book series that’s over half their age holy shit.

granted when i was 13 i was technically homeless and also writing about harry potter getting his ass fucked by voldemort but…c’est la vie. god kids are so ignorant y’all need to learn you some fandom history like holy fuck, i’m filled with a mix of pity and indigestion.”

Claude is referring to this post which reads, ‘Stop shipping literal kids’.

From Tumblr’s Terms of Service:

“You have to be at least 13 years old to use Tumblr. We’re serious: it’s a hard rule, based on U.S. federal and state legislation. “But I’m, like, 12.9 years old!” you plead. Nope, sorry. If you’re younger than 13, don’t use Tumblr. Ask your parents for a Playstation 4, or try books.“

13-year-olds have every right to be on Tumblr, and have every right to expect adults not to fetishize children and child abuse in fiction.

Advertisements

Fujoshis

kmclaude:

“Honestly though what I ALSO don’t get is that the issue seems to be that the evil women are fetishizing mlm due to yaoi being unrealistic and usually full of “”””gross”””” stuff like turning straights and dub-con and even non-con but like…have these lil bitches read fucking gay erotic literature or even watched a gay porno?

The answer is no because they’re all a bunch of sex repulsed babies and like I get it as I’m rather sex repulsed too but come the fuck on y’all”

Like…if yaoi is so problematic then what the fuck is gay porn then because uhhhhh shit’s full of incest and turning straight guys and loads of consent issues and usually a lot more brutal. Oh and like little story too like at least yaoi tries for some story – hell some BL series have a number of tankoubons where the sex is only a few scenes in the grander story.”

Nobody’s saying that guy-on-guy porn produced for a male audience can’t be problematic. What people (mainly men who love men) are saying is that fujoshis (female fans of the yaoi genre) need to be more careful when portraying same-gender relationships in fiction because most fujoshis are straight and therefore have straight privilege.

Also, calling sex-repulsed people babies and later claiming that trans men who love men are equivalent to straight women for being assigned female at birth is really disgusting.

“You: *draws porn of little boys* LOL it’s just fiction chill. Also you: I want a harem of little boys.”

kmclaude:

You: *deliberately takes a joke out of context because that’s all you’ve got for your baseless accusations and hate*
I could draw a dog fucking the putrefying corpse of an infant on an altar with the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ in the middle of a satanic, cannibalistic orgy and it would still be just fiction – just art – rather than some reflection of my moral character. Amazing.

Anon’s got a point. You can’t claim your interests are solely confined to fiction when you openly long for your own underage harem and imply you’re an ephebophile. That dog/dead baby scenario you just came up with isn’t helping your case either.

Interesting how Claude demeans minors for being concerned about fiction that glamorizes child abuse and rape when he posts stuff like this.

‘Incestuous, Pederastic Mermaids’

Twitter Screenshot

[“How we feel ’bout incestuous, pederastic mermaids, and a short comic, or perhaps illustrated storybook (a literal graphic novel) about them?” Poll results: 88% ‘Yes do it’, 12% ‘Why can’t you be normal?’]

Source.

According to Claude, the merpeople in this proposed story have an entirely separate moral system, and also practice necrophilia. Considering the way he’s portrayed these things in the past, it feels like an excuse to promote them as fetishes.

“A cis person asked Claude if liking porn that fetishizes transfolk is okay or not. Three guesses as to how Claude responded. Hint: It was gross.”

From the post in question:

“Dude, it’s just drawings. Who fucking cares, enjoy it. Besides, futa and cuntboys ain’t trans so please don’t feel guilty or let anyone make you feel bad for liking that shit.”

If the characters in futa/cuntboy porn aren’t supposed to be trans, then why do people see them as interchangeable with trans people? Why do people use the terms ‘futa’ and ‘cuntboy’ as slurs against trans people? Fact is, cis people who consume and produce this kind of porn are harming trans people, because they’re treating us as if our existence is inherently deviant and reducing us to a fetish.

(Also, FYI, futa/cuntboy porn harms intersex people too.)

Dark Fiction ≠ Fetishizing Depravity

kmclaude:

“Having seen like… one episode of Gravity Falls (the one with Bill possessing Dipper and he had a reverend suit because my roommates were like YOU WANNA FUCK PRIESTS YOU LIKE DEMONS LOOK and for that I thank them), I am terribly confused as to how the fuck antis survived there, like, it seems like the same kinda weirdly dark “””kids””””” show that I would’ve grown up on in the 90s or early aughts, like, it was weird and creepy like how you gonna not tolerate dark content, that shit got dark. Nice sure but…a kid got possessed. You don’t usually have possession in kawaii, nonproblematic, sugary sweet shows. How you get Purity Wankers in such a fandom/show blows my mind.”

#1. Dark content ≠ fetishizing gross shit. People who create dark or creepy works of fiction don’t have to glorify things like incest and pedophilia the way Claude does.

#2. The statement ‘You wanna fuck priests’ is really disturbing in this context, considering Dipper is officially underage.

Sexy School Girls

kmclaude:

“Anyone who says that slutty (Catholic) school girl costumes (for Halloween or for the boudoir) are sexualizing ~actual children~ have never worn a goddamn school uniform and have never met a uniform-wearing Catholic middle or high school girl ever in their lives.”

Okay, but the intent behind it is bad because you’re still romanticizing the idea of a sexualized child. Also, did it ever occur to you that some of the people complaining about this are actual kids who have to wear school uniforms?

‘Were the soccer moms that Daddy touched in their no-no places.’ This kinda sounds like a dig at survivors of rape/sexual abuse. Not surprised you’d make these kinds of comments, considering you’re a pedophile and therefore want to rape kids (Don’t deny you’re a pedo, I’ve seen the comic where you call yourself an underage kink-haver). “

“Nah it’s a rude dig at people who took a bad thing that happened to them and used those issues to treat others like garbage.
Crazy thought but people tend not to be nice to those people who accuse them of extremely grave things because they like certain topics in kinky fanfiction. By that logic, I want to murder people because I love fiction with murder, and I must also want to eat people because I’m a slut for erotic cannibalism in the art and lit I consume. What’s ironic here, this comic? I never said I was. Even if I did, I was speaking on fiction and fanfic pairings but here you are saying I wanna fuck kids based on… nothing.
You don’t get to throw stones and then demand the people you hit smile sweetly and speak well of you.”

#1. Jacking off to cannibalism, children being sexually violated, and incest isn’t kinky, it’s disgusting.

#2. In that comic Anon mentioned, you literally said, ‘Us weird, non-con, incest, and underage kink-havers’!

#3. ‘You don’t get to throw stones and then demand the people you hit smile sweetly and speak well of you.’ Those are pretty big words coming from someone who just shat on survivors of incestuous rape and abuse.

kmclaude:

“But then again, LiveJournal’s Strikethrough happened in 2007 and back then, the Warriors For Innocence were the soccer moms Daddy touched in their no-no places (No seriously, I’m not exaggerating, though I am being rude and frankly don’t care, fuck censorship and the cunts who uphold it), and they were the HATED MINORITY in fandom which told them, ‘Uh, fuck off’.

And that was after years of Bush crap, whereas now fandom has mostly kowtowed to those same types. Like if there was a Strikethrough now, I don’t think there’d be the same outrage and push-back. And again, I and many others were kids and teens in the Bush Era and we aren’t like these fuck-headed cunts who get wet at the thought of censorship and abusing others because, ‘It’s only okay to bully and harass when I do it to people I deem acceptable targets’.”

Yikes.

  • The statement, ‘…Were the soccer moms Daddy touched in their no-no places’ kinda sounds like a dig at survivors of incestuous rape and sexual abuse.
  • Telling people not to glorify rape, abuse, pedophilia, etc. isn’t censorship, abuse, or harassment.

Incestophilia

Twitter screenshot

[“Tempted to post the smut comic I did that was an F.U. to people who go, ‘If you ship X you’re shipping literal pedophilia/incest/abuse/concept’.”]

Source.

Not this shit again.

For those who don’t know, Claude made a comic back in 2015 about the human personifications of incest and pedophilia. Pedophilia and Incest were portrayed as a father and daughter who were in a DD/LG relationship, and the comic was very explicit. Claude tried to justify this by encouraging people to donate to organizations like RAINN instead of paying for the comic.

Collection of posts from their Tumblr concerning this comic (Warning: The last picture on the page is an explicit drawing that depicts father/daughter incest).