“You: *draws porn of little boys* LOL it’s just fiction chill. Also you: I want a harem of little boys.”

kmclaude:

You: *deliberately takes a joke out of context because that’s all you’ve got for your baseless accusations and hate*
I could draw a dog fucking the putrefying corpse of an infant on an altar with the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ in the middle of a satanic, cannibalistic orgy and it would still be just fiction – just art – rather than some reflection of my moral character. Amazing.

Anon’s got a point. You can’t claim your interests are solely confined to fiction when you openly long for your own underage harem and imply you’re an ephebophile. That dog/dead baby scenario you just came up with isn’t helping your case either.

Interesting how Claude demeans minors for being concerned about fiction that glamorizes child abuse and rape when he posts stuff like this.

Advertisements

Never become a therapist, Claude.

kmclaude:

“YOU CAN GO TO SCHOOL FOR THAT?!?! God – OK seriously like that’s my dream. My dream job is comic artist and/or the kinda person who works in rehabilitating sex offenders or EVEN BETTER helping preventing such offenses LIKE WHAT THEY DO AT PREVENTION PROJECT DUNKELFELD (but I don’t speak German so that’s a tad difficult) because it just interests me so much.”

Yeah, we all know why you’d want to work around pedophiles and sex offenders, K. M. Claude. You can claim all you want that you want to keep them from offending, but your actions tell a different story:

Content warnings for pornographic, gory artwork of children and pedophile apologism.

  • You’ve claimed that pedophilia is a mental illness, even thought it’s not, indicating you have no idea what you’re doing.
    • You also call people ableist for being disgusted by pedophiles, indicating you see nothing inherently wrong with being attracted to kids.
      • Proper treatment for pedophilia involves getting pedophiles to admit their attraction to kids is wrong, so your attitude is counterproductive.
  • You also draw extreme fetish artwork of children, which encourages pedophiles to sexualize them.
  • Worst of all, you’ve made statements that imply you’re a pedophile, which makes it doubtful that you’d be a competent therapist.

Quit using sex abuse scandals as your shield.

kmclaude:

“but also i’m reminded of that one iconic moment from america’s next top model where this one girl is like sobbing and throwing a tantrum over a missed cab and one of the models goes “I just wanna tell you that some people have war in their countries” – like there are literal child and teen molestation scandals coming out like we time traveled to goddamn 2002 and 2003 with the Catholic Church scandals and then Michael Jackson’s scandals but hey, you know, harassing a queer indie artist who creates content specifically about how abuse fucks you up (so, you know, abuse is bad is the only logical conclusion) is really sticking it to the man and helping people.”

There’s a lot to unpack here. Content warnings for pornographic artwork of children and K. M. Claude defending pedophilia.

Continue reading

kmclaude:

“tbh it is frightening because I find myself having to fight a new instinct to just roll my eyes when people not only get accused en masse for sex crimes but even get convicted of/proven guilty of/admit to it because it’s like “okay when this headline says ‘child pornography arrest’ do they mean completely legal loli manga or stupid GF fanart or actual CP” and then I click the headline and am like oh right this is the somewhat sane, real world where words DO have meaning!”

If you roll your eyes and act like it’s not a big deal when someone gets arrested for possessing child porn, that’s your problem. Also, you might want to get acquainted with the phrase, ‘simulated child porn’.

Honestly, I’m not surprised Claude is acting like this, considering they’ve drawn pornographic artwork of children (Album is explicit).

“Claude flat-out shows how much he hates women and acts like rape culture isn’t real. How does anyone support this sick fuck?”

Before anyone tries to argue that K. M. Claude doesn’t hate women, keep in mind he has stated that all women are ‘fucking cunts’. Also, he has downplayed rape culture while using victim-blaming rhetoric.

As for why Claude still has fans: People have a tendency to defend their favorite content creators no matter what. They probably believe that because Claude draws well, he can be as terrible as he likes.

“I’m on the ‘Rape culture is a thing, but people tend to overexaggerate it’ team and like… Fiction doesn’t encourage rape? Normalization is top-down, and it’s more reinforced by cultural gender roles than anything? Anon needs to stop drinking the Kool-Aid?”

kmclaude:

“Bingo. Useful term that’s been taken out back, fucked up the ass, and bastardized to hell and back. Like most social justice.”

Constantly portraying rape as desirable, romantic, sexy, etc. absolutely can normalize it. Also, I find it interesting that you downplay rape culture when you:

  • Reblogged a post blaming minors for their sexual trauma.
  • Equated being asked to stop romanticizing rape with being banned from ever discussing it, indicating that you believe romanticizing rape is an integral part of depicting it.

‘Were the soccer moms that Daddy touched in their no-no places.’ This kinda sounds like a dig at survivors of rape/sexual abuse. Not surprised you’d make these kinds of comments, considering you’re a pedophile and therefore want to rape kids (Don’t deny you’re a pedo, I’ve seen the comic where you call yourself an underage kink-haver). “

“Nah it’s a rude dig at people who took a bad thing that happened to them and used those issues to treat others like garbage.
Crazy thought but people tend not to be nice to those people who accuse them of extremely grave things because they like certain topics in kinky fanfiction. By that logic, I want to murder people because I love fiction with murder, and I must also want to eat people because I’m a slut for erotic cannibalism in the art and lit I consume. What’s ironic here, this comic? I never said I was. Even if I did, I was speaking on fiction and fanfic pairings but here you are saying I wanna fuck kids based on… nothing.
You don’t get to throw stones and then demand the people you hit smile sweetly and speak well of you.”

#1. Jacking off to cannibalism, children being sexually violated, and incest isn’t kinky, it’s disgusting.

#2. In that comic Anon mentioned, you literally said, ‘Us weird, non-con, incest, and underage kink-havers’!

#3. ‘You don’t get to throw stones and then demand the people you hit smile sweetly and speak well of you.’ Those are pretty big words coming from someone who just shat on survivors of incestuous rape and abuse.

kmclaude:

“But then again, LiveJournal’s Strikethrough happened in 2007 and back then, the Warriors For Innocence were the soccer moms Daddy touched in their no-no places (No seriously, I’m not exaggerating, though I am being rude and frankly don’t care, fuck censorship and the cunts who uphold it), and they were the HATED MINORITY in fandom which told them, ‘Uh, fuck off’.

And that was after years of Bush crap, whereas now fandom has mostly kowtowed to those same types. Like if there was a Strikethrough now, I don’t think there’d be the same outrage and push-back. And again, I and many others were kids and teens in the Bush Era and we aren’t like these fuck-headed cunts who get wet at the thought of censorship and abusing others because, ‘It’s only okay to bully and harass when I do it to people I deem acceptable targets’.”

Yikes.

  • The statement, ‘…Were the soccer moms Daddy touched in their no-no places’ kinda sounds like a dig at survivors of incestuous rape and sexual abuse.
  • Telling people not to glorify rape, abuse, pedophilia, etc. isn’t censorship, abuse, or harassment.

Why Can’t We Care About Both?

kmclaude:

“#I’ll stop w the reblogs but yall….y’all hand to god I’ve had moments where I read news articles #about actual child molesters ans actual cp and upon reading the headline there was a moment I thought #‘what bad fanart did this person look at now’ before reading and it’s like no this was real abuse of kids #what I’m getting at is people have made this word no longer have meaning #and that is terrifying #DID NONE OF YOU DUMB LITTLE FUCKS READ THE BOY WHO CRIED WOLF?!?!?! #Apparently NOT because even toddlers know that if you LIE no one will believe you or anyone when one day it’s true #when you say everything is cp or everything is pedophilia when it’s NOT ypu make it harder for those #who have been exploited in cp or abused or raped by child molesters to get justice”

No one is denying that porn of real children is worse than pornographic artwork of children. Stop using the sexual exploitation of children as a shield for your own gross behavior.

For those not familiar with Claude, they’ve drawn pornographic artwork of children before (Link is very NSFW).

“Roachpatrol and Claude are like, ‘What’s wrong with sexualizing stuff?’. You fucking know why it’s wrong, you just wanna sea lion people into going with your bullshit.”

(Anon is referring to this post)

K. M. Claude and Roachpatrol are missing the point. When people complain about sexualization, they’re complaining about:

  • People, particularly marginalized people, being oversexualized and reduced to fetish objects.
  • Portraying harmful things such as rape, pedophilia, or incest as sexy.
    • I’d like to remind people that both Claude and Roach have made pornographic fiction about minors being sexually abused. Claude has also created a lot of rape/incest-themed porn involving their adult characters.