“The mods of that post are 16, 15, and 13? Go do your homework?”

kmclaude:

“why is a thirteen year old discoursing about sexual ships they should be on neopets not on a website whose mobile app is 17+ and which allows smut (18+ in I think Germany if I remember the screengrab @kirtlandswarbler took) if they don’t like fandom ships that for the record are older than they are for a book series that’s over half their age holy shit.

granted when i was 13 i was technically homeless and also writing about harry potter getting his ass fucked by voldemort but…c’est la vie. god kids are so ignorant y’all need to learn you some fandom history like holy fuck, i’m filled with a mix of pity and indigestion.”

Claude is referring to this post which reads, ‘Stop shipping literal kids’.

From Tumblr’s Terms of Service:

“You have to be at least 13 years old to use Tumblr. We’re serious: it’s a hard rule, based on U.S. federal and state legislation. “But I’m, like, 12.9 years old!” you plead. Nope, sorry. If you’re younger than 13, don’t use Tumblr. Ask your parents for a Playstation 4, or try books.“

13-year-olds have every right to be on Tumblr, and have every right to expect adults not to fetishize children and child abuse in fiction.

Advertisements

“You: *draws porn of little boys* LOL it’s just fiction chill. Also you: I want a harem of little boys.”

kmclaude:

You: *deliberately takes a joke out of context because that’s all you’ve got for your baseless accusations and hate*
I could draw a dog fucking the putrefying corpse of an infant on an altar with the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ in the middle of a satanic, cannibalistic orgy and it would still be just fiction – just art – rather than some reflection of my moral character. Amazing.

Anon’s got a point. You can’t claim your interests are solely confined to fiction when you openly long for your own underage harem and imply you’re an ephebophile. That dog/dead baby scenario you just came up with isn’t helping your case either.

Interesting how Claude demeans minors for being concerned about fiction that glamorizes child abuse and rape when he posts stuff like this.

“So question: is Tiefer a hebephile in general or is it just Jehan? Like, would he get hot and bothered at the sight of a sexy teen boy in general, or does Jehan get special treatment for looking like his daddy?”

kmclaude:

Jehan’s special for looking like his daddy but I think Tiefer does have a preference for older teens and young adults–jailbait and college boys but I mean, that’s fairly normal for adults to be attracted to other sexually mature people, he’s not like…actively pursuing based on someone’s age (he’s just also not about to stop upon finding out someone’s say 16 or 17. So no, he’s not really.

Claude’s response to someone asking if one of his characters is a hebephile (pedophile with a preference for 11- to 14-year-olds) for being attracted to his underage godson.

If an adult is attracted to a minor, they are a pedophile period, even if they’re only focused on a particular person. They’re also a pedophile if they continue to sexually pursue someone after finding out they’re 16.

Also, claiming it’s okay for adults to be attracted to sexually mature people in the same sentence where you refer to older teens as ‘jailbait’ proves you think it’s okay for adults to pursue minors who’ve hit puberty, which makes you a pedophile and abuse apologist.

Never become a therapist, Claude.

kmclaude:

“YOU CAN GO TO SCHOOL FOR THAT?!?! God – OK seriously like that’s my dream. My dream job is comic artist and/or the kinda person who works in rehabilitating sex offenders or EVEN BETTER helping preventing such offenses LIKE WHAT THEY DO AT PREVENTION PROJECT DUNKELFELD (but I don’t speak German so that’s a tad difficult) because it just interests me so much.”

Yeah, we all know why you’d want to work around pedophiles and sex offenders, K. M. Claude. You can claim all you want that you want to keep them from offending, but your actions tell a different story:

Content warnings for pornographic, gory artwork of children and pedophile apologism.

  • You’ve claimed that pedophilia is a mental illness, even thought it’s not, indicating you have no idea what you’re doing.
    • You also call people ableist for being disgusted by pedophiles, indicating you see nothing inherently wrong with being attracted to kids.
      • Proper treatment for pedophilia involves getting pedophiles to admit their attraction to kids is wrong, so your attitude is counterproductive.
  • You also draw extreme fetish artwork of children, which encourages pedophiles to sexualize them.
  • Worst of all, you’ve made statements that imply you’re a pedophile, which makes it doubtful that you’d be a competent therapist.

Quit using sex abuse scandals as your shield.

kmclaude:

“but also i’m reminded of that one iconic moment from america’s next top model where this one girl is like sobbing and throwing a tantrum over a missed cab and one of the models goes “I just wanna tell you that some people have war in their countries” – like there are literal child and teen molestation scandals coming out like we time traveled to goddamn 2002 and 2003 with the Catholic Church scandals and then Michael Jackson’s scandals but hey, you know, harassing a queer indie artist who creates content specifically about how abuse fucks you up (so, you know, abuse is bad is the only logical conclusion) is really sticking it to the man and helping people.”

There’s a lot to unpack here. Content warnings for pornographic artwork of children and K. M. Claude defending pedophilia.

Continue reading

“Don’t you like… hate kids?”

kmclaude:

“I’m not a huge fan of them, no. I’d never be senselessly cruel to a child or purposefully hurt a child – or anyone, really – but I’m not a big fan.”

Just because you don’t like kids in general doesn’t mean you aren’t sexually attracted to them (For people who haven’t heard about K. M. Claude, read this list for proof that he’s a pedophile). Sexual attraction to someone doesn’t necessarily mean you want to spend time with them on a regular basis.

‘Incestuous, Pederastic Mermaids’

Twitter Screenshot

[“How we feel ’bout incestuous, pederastic mermaids, and a short comic, or perhaps illustrated storybook (a literal graphic novel) about them?” Poll results: 88% ‘Yes do it’, 12% ‘Why can’t you be normal?’]

Source.

According to Claude, the merpeople in this proposed story have an entirely separate moral system, and also practice necrophilia. Considering the way he’s portrayed these things in the past, it feels like an excuse to promote them as fetishes.

kmclaude:

“tbh it is frightening because I find myself having to fight a new instinct to just roll my eyes when people not only get accused en masse for sex crimes but even get convicted of/proven guilty of/admit to it because it’s like “okay when this headline says ‘child pornography arrest’ do they mean completely legal loli manga or stupid GF fanart or actual CP” and then I click the headline and am like oh right this is the somewhat sane, real world where words DO have meaning!”

If you roll your eyes and act like it’s not a big deal when someone gets arrested for possessing child porn, that’s your problem. Also, you might want to get acquainted with the phrase, ‘simulated child porn’.

Honestly, I’m not surprised Claude is acting like this, considering they’ve drawn pornographic artwork of children (Album is explicit).

Worse Than Dahmer

kmclaude:

“WELL NOW HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO MARKET MY DIARY COMIC COLLECTION ‘WORSE THAN DAHMER’ IF I’M NO LONGER WORSE THAN A LITERAL NECROPHILIAC MINOR-FUCKING SERIAL KILLER BECAUSE I DRAW EROTIC GROTESQUE ART (ACCORDING TO SOME DUMB CUNT ON THIS SITE, A SITE WHICH IS A LOT SOMETIMES)? Man, there goes MY marketing technique.”

My exact words:

“I wouldn’t say K. M. Claude is as bad as Dahmer since Claude hasn’t killed or raped anyone.” – [x]

I never said you were as bad as Dahmer, quit lying.