kmclaude:

“But then again, LiveJournal’s Strikethrough happened in 2007 and back then, the Warriors For Innocence were the soccer moms Daddy touched in their no-no places (No seriously, I’m not exaggerating, though I am being rude and frankly don’t care, fuck censorship and the cunts who uphold it), and they were the HATED MINORITY in fandom which told them, ‘Uh, fuck off’.

And that was after years of Bush crap, whereas now fandom has mostly kowtowed to those same types. Like if there was a Strikethrough now, I don’t think there’d be the same outrage and push-back. And again, I and many others were kids and teens in the Bush Era and we aren’t like these fuck-headed cunts who get wet at the thought of censorship and abusing others because, ‘It’s only okay to bully and harass when I do it to people I deem acceptable targets’.”

Yikes.

  • The statement, ‘…Were the soccer moms Daddy touched in their no-no places’ kinda sounds like a dig at survivors of incestuous rape and sexual abuse.
  • Telling people not to glorify rape, abuse, pedophilia, etc. isn’t censorship, abuse, or harassment.
Advertisements

“TBH I’m surprised more people don’t ship it too, but imagine Lucien making excuses to hold his dad’s hand.”

kmclaude:

“I’m both shocked because why wouldn’t you ship it and not shocked because have you SEEN the purity wank and the state of fandom thanks to Tumblr lately?

Apparently, wanting fandoms to be free of content that promotes incest and pedophilia is just ‘purity wank’ now.

Go away, Claude.

kmclaude:

“I saw it after checking the Damien & Lucien [tag] which seems counter-intuitive because as far as I’ve been in fandom, ‘&’ was used for close friendship/familial/otherwise platonic relationships while the ‘/’ was like using ‘X’, it means character A and character B in a relationship so that was confusing. But also I’m just bitching because BACK IN MY DAY a Gothic father/son incest ship would have more than one goddamn fic, that shit wouldn’t be hidden, that would be prime shipping content right there.”

Maybe the reason there’s so little content for that pairing is because most people realize that incest and pedophilia are wrong, and should never be glamorized?

Incestophilia

Twitter screenshot
[“Tempted to post the smut comic I did that was an F.U. to people who go, ‘If you ship X your shipping literal pedophilia/incest/abuse/concept’.”]

Source.

Not this shit again.

For those who don’t know, Claude made a comic back in 2015 about the human personifications of incest and pedophilia. Pedophilia and Incest were portrayed as a father and daughter who were in a DD/LG relationship, and the comic was very explicit. Claude tried to justify this by encouraging people to donate to organizations like RAINN instead of paying for the comic.

Collection of posts from their Tumblr concerning this comic (Warning: The last picture on the page is an explicit drawing of father/daughter incest).

“Roachpatrol and Claude are like, ‘What’s wrong with sexualizing stuff?’. You fucking know why it’s wrong, you just wanna sea lion people into going with your bullshit.”

(Anon is referring to this post)

K. M. Claude and Roachpatrol are missing the point. When people complain about sexualization, they’re complaining about:

  • People, particularly marginalized people, being oversexualized and reduced to fetish objects.
  • Portraying harmful things such as rape, pedophilia, or incest as sexy.
    • I’d like to remind people that both Claude and Roach have made erotic fiction about minors being sexually abused. Claude has also created a lot of rape/incest-themed porn involving their adult characters.

“The kink-shame/kink-same thing going on is saying a lot about Claude as a human being.”

Saw a bunch of disgusting incestuous crap on K. M. Claude’s blog a few moments ago…

Content warnings for explicit discussion of incest, sexual abuse, and rape.

Continue reading Saw a bunch of disgusting incestuous crap on K. M. Claude’s blog a few moments ago…

PSA: K. M. Claude Richard

Aliases:

Content warnings for explicit depictions of pedophilia, sexual depictions of children, child abuse, rape, sexual abuse, blood, gore, necrophilia, incest; harassment, bullying, self-harm, victim-shaming/survivor-shaming, transphobia, transmisogyny, dyadism¹ᵃ/perisexism¹ᵇ, and misgendering.

I. Fetishizes children and child abuse

II. Defends pedophiles and pedophilia

  • Believes children can abuse adults.
    • This is a common argument used by child abusers to justify harming their victims.
  • Thinks it’s okay for adults to be attracted to 15- and 16-year-olds.
  • Believes it’s ableist to shame pedophiles for their desires.
    • Also believes that pedophilia is a mental illness.
    • According to the DSM-5, pedophiles only qualify as mentally ill if they feel genuine remorse for their attraction to children. Since most pedophiles don’t feel bad about these desires, they aren’t considered mentally ill simply for being pedophiles.
  • Compares pedophilia to asexuality.
  • Also this.

III. Nasty Fetishes

IV. Belittles and bullies their critics

V. Transphobia/Dyadism/Perisexism

¹ᵃ¹ᵇ – Dyadism/perisexism refers to prejudice/discrimination/oppression directed at intersex people.