“You: *draws porn of little boys* LOL it’s just fiction chill. Also you: I want a harem of little boys.”

kmclaude:

You: *deliberately takes a joke out of context because that’s all you’ve got for your baseless accusations and hate*
I could draw a dog fucking the putrefying corpse of an infant on an altar with the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ in the middle of a satanic, cannibalistic orgy and it would still be just fiction – just art – rather than some reflection of my moral character. Amazing.

Anon’s got a point. You can’t claim your interests are solely confined to fiction when you openly long for your own underage harem and imply you’re an ephebophile. That dog/dead baby scenario you just came up with isn’t helping your case either.

Interesting how Claude demeans minors for being concerned about fiction that glamorizes child abuse and rape when he posts stuff like this.

Advertisements

Worse Than Dahmer

kmclaude:

“WELL NOW HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO MARKET MY DIARY COMIC COLLECTION ‘WORSE THAN DAHMER’ IF I’M NO LONGER WORSE THAN A LITERAL NECROPHILIAC MINOR-FUCKING SERIAL KILLER BECAUSE I DRAW EROTIC GROTESQUE ART (ACCORDING TO SOME DUMB CUNT ON THIS SITE, A SITE WHICH IS A LOT SOMETIMES)? Man, there goes MY marketing technique.”

My exact words:

“I wouldn’t say K. M. Claude is as bad as Dahmer since Claude hasn’t killed or raped anyone.” – [x]

I never said you were as bad as Dahmer, quit lying.

“I’m on the ‘Rape culture is a thing, but people tend to overexaggerate it’ team and like… Fiction doesn’t encourage rape? Normalization is top-down, and it’s more reinforced by cultural gender roles than anything? Anon needs to stop drinking the Kool-Aid?”

kmclaude:

“Bingo. Useful term that’s been taken out back, fucked up the ass, and bastardized to hell and back. Like most social justice.”

Constantly portraying rape as desirable, romantic, sexy, etc. absolutely can normalize it. Also, I find it interesting that you downplay rape culture when you:

  • Reblogged a post blaming minors for their sexual trauma.
  • Equated being asked to stop romanticizing rape with being banned from ever discussing it, indicating that you believe romanticizing rape is an integral part of depicting it.

‘Were the soccer moms that Daddy touched in their no-no places.’ This kinda sounds like a dig at survivors of rape/sexual abuse. Not surprised you’d make these kinds of comments, considering you’re a pedophile and therefore want to rape kids (Don’t deny you’re a pedo, I’ve seen the comic where you call yourself an underage kink-haver). “

“Nah it’s a rude dig at people who took a bad thing that happened to them and used those issues to treat others like garbage.
Crazy thought but people tend not to be nice to those people who accuse them of extremely grave things because they like certain topics in kinky fanfiction. By that logic, I want to murder people because I love fiction with murder, and I must also want to eat people because I’m a slut for erotic cannibalism in the art and lit I consume. What’s ironic here, this comic? I never said I was. Even if I did, I was speaking on fiction and fanfic pairings but here you are saying I wanna fuck kids based on… nothing.
You don’t get to throw stones and then demand the people you hit smile sweetly and speak well of you.”

#1. Jacking off to cannibalism, children being sexually violated, and incest isn’t kinky, it’s disgusting.

#2. In that comic Anon mentioned, you literally said, ‘Us weird, non-con, incest, and underage kink-havers’!

#3. ‘You don’t get to throw stones and then demand the people you hit smile sweetly and speak well of you.’ Those are pretty big words coming from someone who just shat on survivors of incestuous rape and abuse.

kmclaude:

“But then again, LiveJournal’s Strikethrough happened in 2007 and back then, the Warriors For Innocence were the soccer moms Daddy touched in their no-no places (No seriously, I’m not exaggerating, though I am being rude and frankly don’t care, fuck censorship and the cunts who uphold it), and they were the HATED MINORITY in fandom which told them, ‘Uh, fuck off’.

And that was after years of Bush crap, whereas now fandom has mostly kowtowed to those same types. Like if there was a Strikethrough now, I don’t think there’d be the same outrage and push-back. And again, I and many others were kids and teens in the Bush Era and we aren’t like these fuck-headed cunts who get wet at the thought of censorship and abusing others because, ‘It’s only okay to bully and harass when I do it to people I deem acceptable targets’.”

Yikes.

  • The statement, ‘…Were the soccer moms Daddy touched in their no-no places’ kinda sounds like a dig at survivors of incestuous rape and sexual abuse.
  • Telling people not to glorify rape, abuse, pedophilia, etc. isn’t censorship, abuse, or harassment.

“Roachpatrol and Claude are like, ‘What’s wrong with sexualizing stuff?’. You fucking know why it’s wrong, you just wanna sea lion people into going with your bullshit.”

(Anon is referring to this post)

K. M. Claude and Roachpatrol are missing the point. When people complain about sexualization, they’re complaining about:

  • People, particularly marginalized people, being oversexualized and reduced to fetish objects.
  • Portraying harmful things such as rape, pedophilia, or incest as sexy.
    • I’d like to remind people that both Claude and Roach have made pornographic fiction about minors being sexually abused. Claude has also created a lot of rape/incest-themed porn involving their adult characters.

Nice Priorities You’ve Got There

kmclaude:

“Possible past rape, pretty definite present rape, the comic is all about consent issues. I super appreciate you recommending my comic but definitely agree that if murky consent is something you tag/warn for, then yeah, definitely might wanna include that (I would hate for someone to get mad at you and your blog because there wasn’t a warning for a very prickly topic).”

Pretty sure people would have every right to be mad at rape and consent issues not being tagged or warned for, considering a.) those are disturbing topics, and b.) being exposed to triggering material could cause some people to have panic attacks or flashbacks.